眼科 ›› 2025, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (3): 202-206.doi: 10.13281/j.cnki.issn.1004-4469.2025.03.005

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

青年人睡眠类型与干眼症状和体征的关系

陈蕊1  王海霞1  刘曼杰1  安璐1  田磊2   

  1. 1首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院麻醉科,北京 100730; 2首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院 北京同仁眼科中心 北京市眼科研究所 眼科学与视觉科学北京市重点实验,北京 100730
  • 收稿日期:2024-09-16 出版日期:2025-05-25 发布日期:2025-05-25
  • 通讯作者: 田磊,Email:tianlei0131@163.com

Relationship between chronotype and dry eye symptoms and signs in young people

Chen Rui1, Wang Haixia1, Liu Manjie1, An Lu1, Tian Lei2   

  1. 1 Department of Anesthestology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100730, China;  2 Beijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University; Beijing Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Beijing 100730, China
  • Received:2024-09-16 Online:2025-05-25 Published:2025-05-25
  • Contact: Tian Lei, Email: tianlei0131@163.com

摘要: 目的 比较青年干眼患者与健康对照的睡眠类型,并评估不同睡眠类型和干眼症状和体征的关系。 设计 病例对照研究。 研究对象 就诊于北京同仁医院的青年干眼患者400例和年龄、性别匹配的健康对照200例。每位受试者随机选取一眼纳入研究。 方法 采集所有受试者的干眼相关指标,比较干眼组和对照组睡眠类型的差异,不同睡眠类型的干眼组患者干眼症状和体征的差异。 主要指标 眼表疾病指数(ocular surface disease index,OSDI)、荧光素泪膜破裂时间(fluorescein breakup time,FBUT)、泪液分泌检查(Schirmer I Test,SIt)、角膜荧光素染色(corneal fluorescein staining,CFS)以及睑板腺缺失程度评分。使用清晨型-夜晚型量表5项(morningness-eveningness questionnaire-5,MEQ-5)中文版评价受试者的睡眠类型。 结果 干眼组的睡眠类型以绝对夜晚型和中度夜晚型为主,而对照组受试者睡眠类型以绝对清晨型和中度清晨型为主,两组差异具有统计学意义(Z=66.36,P<0.001)。不同睡眠类型的干眼患者相比,夜晚型患者的OSDI评分(42.0)显著大于中间型(32.0)和清晨型(23.0)的患者(H=70.33,P<0.001)。夜晚型患者的SIt(3.0 mm)显著低于中间型(5.0 mm)和清晨型(6.0 mm)的患者(H=81.76,P<0.001);夜晚型患者的中、重度睑板腺缺失比例显著高于中间型和清晨型患者(H=10.80,P=0.029)。 结论 青年干眼患者与健康对照组相比,睡眠类型更偏向夜晚型。在患有干眼的患者组内,夜晚型患者的干眼症状和体征也较中间型和清晨型更重。(眼科,2025,34: 202-206)

关键词: 青年人, 干眼, 睡眠类型

Abstract: Objective To compare the chronotype of young dry eye patients and healthy controls, and to evaluate the relationship between different chronotypes and dry eye symptoms and signs. Design Case-control study.  Participants A total of 400 young dry eye patients who visited Beijing Tongren Hospital, and 200 age- and gender-matched healthy controls were included. One eye was randomly selected for each patient for the analysis.  Methods Dry eye-related indicators were collected from all participants, and differences in chronotypes between the dry eye group and the control group as well as differences in dry eye symptoms and signs among patients with different chronotypes in the dry eye group were compared. Main Outcome Measures Ocular surface disease index (OSDI), fluorescein breakup time (FBUT), Schirmer I Test (SIt), corneal fluorescein staining (CFS), and meibomian gland loss score. The Chinese version of the morningness-eveningness questionnaire-5 (MEQ-5) was used to assess participants' circadian rhythm types.  Results In the dry eye group, the predominant chronotypes were definite evening type and moderate evening type, whereas in the control group, definite morning type and moderate morning type were predominant, with statistically significant differences between the two groups (Z=66.36, P<0.001). Among dry eye patients with different chronotypes, the OSDI score of evening type patients (42.0) was significantly higher than that of neutral  (32.0) and morning type patients (23.0) (H=70.33, P<0.001). The SIt in evening type patients  (3.0 mm) was significantly lower than in neutral (5.0 mm) and morning type patients (6.0 mm) (H=81.76, P<0.001); the proportion of moderate to severe meibomian gland loss was significantly higher in evening type patients than in neutral and morning type patients (H=10.80, P=0.029). Conclusion Compared with healthy controls, young dry eye patients exhibit a trend toward evening-type chronotype. Within the dry eye patient group, evening-type patients had more severe dry eye symptoms and signs compared to morning-type patients. (Ophthalmol CHN, 2025, 34: 202-206)

Key words: young subjects, dry eye, chronotype