国际眼科纵览 ›› 2013, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (5): 345-349.doi: 10.3706/ cma.j.issn.1673-5803.2013.05.012

• 综述 • 上一篇    下一篇

玻璃体内注药术后眼内炎的危险因素及预防

李逸丰, 魏文斌   

  1. 100730 首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院 北京同仁眼科中心 北京市眼科学与视觉科学重点实验室
  • 收稿日期:2013-05-16 出版日期:2013-10-22 发布日期:2013-10-23
  • 通讯作者: 魏文斌,Email:weiwenbintr@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    北京市自然科学基金(7112031);国家自然科学基金(81272981);北京市卫生系统高层次卫生技术人才培养计划(2009-3-32)

Risk factors and prevention of endophthalmitis after intravitreal injection

 LI  Yi-Feng, WEI  Wen-Bin   

  1. Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Laboratory, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Bejing 100730, China
  • Received:2013-05-16 Online:2013-10-22 Published:2013-10-23
  • Contact: WEI Wen-bin, Email: weiwenbintr@163.com

摘要: 近年来玻璃体内药物注射的发展非常迅速,应用范围不断扩大,尤其是玻璃体内注射抗血管内皮生长因子(vascular endothelial growth factor,VEGF)制剂已成为眼科最常用的治疗方法之一。因此更有必要认真审视其并发症,尤其是眼内炎这一玻璃体内注射最严重的并发症。研究显示玻璃体内注射抗VEGF制剂后眼内炎发生率约0.02%~0.09%。危险因素包括注射前危险因素(活动性外眼感染、按压眼睑、较粗注射针头、青光眼、糖尿病等系统性疾病),注射中危险因素(飞沫传播、无菌操作不严格)和注射后危险因素(多次注射)等。围手术期使用抗生素预防的效果尚无定论。(国际眼科纵览, 2013, 37:  345-349)

Abstract: Intravitreal injections have been developed and applied rapidly in recent years, especially the intravitreal injection of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which has become one of the most common treatments in ophthalmology.  This underscores the need that the complications of such treatment ought to merit full attention.  Endophthalmitis is the most serious complication of intravitreal injections.  Studies showed that the occurrence rate for endophthalmitis after the injection of VEGF is in the range of 0.02%~0.09%, with risk factors involving those before the injection, such as active external ocular infection, pressing of the eyelid, thick needles, glaucoma, diabetes and other systemic diseases; those during the injection, such as droplet transmission and flawed aseptic technique; and those after the injection, such as multiinjections.  The effects of antibiotic treatments during perioperative period are not yet clear.   (Int Rev Ophthalmol, 2013, 37: 345-349)