眼科

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

非球面变色人工晶状体植入术后3个月不同照明条件下视觉效果的临床观察

张景尚 王进达 熊瑛 李婧 万修华   

  1. 100005 首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院 北京同仁眼科中心 北京市眼科研究所 眼科学与视觉科学北京市重点实验室
  • 收稿日期:2018-08-30 出版日期:2019-03-25 发布日期:2019-03-28
  • 通讯作者: 万修华,Email:xiuhuawan@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    北京市科技新星(H020821380190,Z131102000413025);国务院妇女儿童工作委员会课题(2014108);国家自然科学基金(30471861);北京市优秀人才(2015000021469G228)

The visual effect of aspheric photochromic intraocular lens implantation at post-operative 3 months in different illumination conditions

ZHANG Jing-shang, WANG Jin-da, XIONG Ying, LI Jing, WAN Xiu-hua   

  1. Beijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Beijing 100005, China
  • Received:2018-08-30 Online:2019-03-25 Published:2019-03-28
  • Contact: WAN Xiu-hua, Email: xiuhuawan@163.com

摘要:

 目的 比较在不同光线条件下非球面变色人工晶状体(intraocular lens, IOL)、非球面黄色IOL和球面变色IOL在白内障患者植入术后的视觉效果。设计 回顾性比较性病例系列。研究对象 白内障超声乳化联合IOL植入治疗后的患者300例。方法 按植入IOL的类型患者被分为三组,分别为非球面变色IOL组100眼,非球面黄色IOL组100眼和球面变色IOL组100眼。术后3个月,检查患者裸眼视力(UDVA)、最佳矫正视力(CDVA)、对比度视力(400 lux, 30 lux)及色觉辨别力(FM-100 hue, 400 lux, 30 lux)。主要指标 视力、对比度视力、色觉辨别力。结果 三组患者术后3个月裸眼视力和矫正远视力无显著差异(P=0.935和P=0.681),在暗光线(30 lux, 对比度5%)下,对比度视力非球面变色IOL组(LogMAR 0.301±0.17)高于其他两组(LogMAR 0.472 ± 0.22和0.327±0.23),三组间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。FM100色棋测试中,在400 lux照度下三组间总错误评分无显著差异(P=0.163),在暗光线下(30 lux)三组患者的辨色力错误总评分均明显增高,并且三组间具有明显的统计学差异(P<0.001),非球面变色IOL组(36.45±14.89)低于比其他两组(46.72±20.67和38.31±15.82)。结论 非球面变色IOL、非球面黄色IOL和球面变色IOL在强光下对比度视力无明显差别,非球面变色IOL在弱光下能够具有更好的对比度视力和更强的色彩辨别能力。(眼科, 2019, 28: 104-108)

关键词: 非球面变色人工晶状体, 对比度视力, 色觉

Abstract:

 Objective To analyze and compare the differences of contrast vision and color vision of three kinds of intraocular lens (IOL) in different illumination conditions in cataract patients. Design Retrospective case series. Participants 300 cases with phacoemulsification and IOL implantation. Methods We chronologically collected 300 patients undergone cataract extraction and implanted with different IOL, 100 eyes in group 1 (implanted with aspheric photochromic IOL), 100 eyes in group 2 (implanted with aspheric yellow IOL) and 100 eyes in group 3 (implanted with spheric photochromic IOL). All eyes were reviewed at 3 months postoperatively. Visual acuity, intraocular pressure (IOP), slit lamp examination, fundus, contrast vision and color vision were recorded. Main Outcome Measures Visual acuity, contrast vision and color vision. Results There is no significant difference in postoperative uncorrected and corrected visual acuity among the three groups (P=0.935, P=0.681). The aspheric photochromic IOL group had better contrast vision than the other two groups at 30 lux, 5% contrast conditions (LogMAR 0.301 ± 0.17 vs LogMAR 0.472 ± 0.22 and 0.327 ± 0.23, both P<0.001). The total error scores of FM 100 test were not significantly different among the three groups at 400 lux conditions (P=0.163), but the total error scores of the aspheric photochromic IOL group was significantly lower than that the other two groups (36.45±14.89 vs 46.72 ±20.67 and 38.31±15.82) at the mesopic conditions (30 lux) (both P<0.001). Conclusion There was no significant difference of contrast vision among eyes implanted with aspheric photochromic IOL, aspheric yellow IOL and spheric photochromic IOL under photopic conditions, but the aspheric photochromic IOL group had better contrast vision and color vision under mesopic conditions. (Ophthalmol CHN, 2019, 28: 104-108)

Key words: aspheric photochromic intraocular lens, contrast vision, color vision