眼科 ›› 2026, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (3): 223-228.doi: 10.13281/j.cnki.issn.1004-4469.2026.03.007.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

经角膜上皮的激光角膜切削术治疗SMILE 术后屈光回退的疗效观察

邹洋  刘琪  吴婉玲  刘伟    

  1. 赣州爱尔眼科医院,江西赣州 341000
  • 收稿日期:2025-05-26 出版日期:2026-05-25 发布日期:2026-05-25
  • 通讯作者: 刘伟,Email:50101647@qq.com

Efficacy observation of transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TransPRK) in treating refractive regression after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE)

Zou Yang, Liu Qi, Wu Wanling, Liu Wei   

  1. Ganzhou Aier Eye Hospital, Ganzhou Jiangxi 341000, China
  • Received:2025-05-26 Online:2026-05-25 Published:2026-05-25
  • Contact: Liu Wei, Email: 50101647@qq.com

摘要: 目的  探讨经角膜上皮的激光角膜切削术(TransPRK)治疗飞秒激光微小切口基质透镜取出术(SMILE)术后屈光回退的疗效。设计  回顾性病例系列。研究对象  2018年1月至2023年1月在赣州爱尔眼科医院治疗的SMILE 术后屈光回退患者20例(22眼)。方法  所有患者均给予TransPRK手术治疗。使用AMARIS 500E准分子激光系统,以角膜视觉中心为切削中心对角膜进行切削。切削之后,用0~4℃平衡盐水冲洗。术后随访12个月,观察手术前与术后1天、3天,1周,1个月、3个月、6个月、12个月裸眼视力(UCVA)、屈光度、调制传递函数截止频率(MTF cut-off)、斯特列尔比(SR)、客观散射指数(OSI)、眼压及角膜中央上皮厚度的变化。主要指标  UCVA、屈光度、MTF截止频率、SR、OSI、眼压、角膜中央上皮厚度。结果  与术前UCVA(0.33±0.10)相比,术后各随访时间点UCVA均提高(F=56.654,P<0.001),屈光度均降低(F=68.112,P<0.001)。其中,术后12个月,UCVA提升至(1.03±0.11)(t=20.05,P<0.001);屈光度从(-2.03±0.34)D改善至(+0.74±0.17)D(t=17.58,P<0.001);角膜中央上皮厚度由术前(52.80±1.54)μm增加到(60.83±2.11)μm(t=14.42,P<0.001);角膜表面曲率由术前(44.42±1.43)D降至(36.44±1.62)D(t=17.33,P<0.001);视觉质量方面,术后12个月MTF截止频率(41.03±1.70)c/deg(t=18.06,P<0.001),SR为0.33±0.08(t=6.82,P<0.001),均较术前的(32.20±1.54)c/deg、0.20±0.04显著提高;OSI为0.59±0.11较术前的1.27±0.11显著降低(t=20.50,P<0.001)。术后各时间点眼压较术前均降低(F=20.102,P<0.001),但术后各时间点之间比较无显著差异(P均>0.05)。所有患者术后未发生Haze等严重并发症。结论  经角膜上皮的激光角膜切削术治疗 SMILE 术后屈光回退安全、有效。

关键词: 经角膜上皮的激光角膜切削术, 飞秒激光微小切口基质透镜取出术, 屈光回退

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the efficacy of transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TransPRK) in the treatment of refractive regression after femtosecond laser small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). Design Retrospective case series. Participants A total of 20 patients (22 eyes) with refractive regression after SMILE who were treated at Ganzhou Aier Eye Hospital from January 2018 to January 2023. Methods All patients underwent TransPRK surgery using the AMARIS 500E excimer laser system, with the corneal visual center as the ablation center. After ablation, the cornea was rinsed with balanced saline solution at 0~4°C. Patients were followed up for 1 year postoperatively. Changes in uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), refractive error, modulation transfer function cutoff frequency (MTF cut-off), Strehl ratio (SR), objective scatter index (OSI), intraocular pressure (IOP), and central corneal epithelial thickness were observed before surgery and at 1 day, 3 days, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively. Main Outcome Measures UCVA, refractive error, MTF cut-off frequency, SR, OSI, IOP, and central corneal epithelial thickness. Results Compared with preoperative values (UCVA: 0.33±0.10), UCVA was significantly improved at all postoperative follow-up time points (F=56.654, P<0.001), and refractive error was significantly reduced (F=68.112, P<0.001). At 12 months postoperatively, UCVA improved to 1.03±0.11 (t=20.05, P<0.001); refractive error improved from (-2.03±0.34) D to (+0.74±0.17) D (t=17.58, P<0.001); central corneal epithelial thickness increased from (52.80±1.54) μm to (60.83±2.11) μm (t=14.42, P<0.001); mean corneal curvature decreased from (44.42±1.43) D to (36.44±1.62) D (t=17.33, P<0.001). In terms of visual quality, at 12 months postoperatively, MTF cut-off frequency was (41.03±1.70) c/deg (t=18.06, P<0.001), SR was 0.33±0.08 (t=6.82, P<0.001), both significantly improved compared with preoperative values (32.20±1.54 c/deg and 0.20±0.04, respectively); OSI was 0.59±0.11, significantly decreased compared with the preoperative value of 1.27±0.11 (t=20.50, P<0.001). IOP was significantly decreased at all postoperative time points compared with preoperative values (F=20.102, P<0.001), but there were no significant differences among postoperative time points (all P>0.05). No severe complications such as corneal haze occurred in any patient postoperatively. Conclusion Transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy is safe and effective for treating refractive regression after SMILE surgery.

Key words:  Transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TransPRK), Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE), Refractive regression