国际眼科纵览 ›› 2025, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (1): 8-12.doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115500-20240902-01002

• 综述 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同检测仪器术前评估晶状体悬韧带功能的应用进展

陶宇菲潘晓华晋爱霞樊宁2   

  1. 1 暨南大学第二临床医学院,深圳 518040; 2 深圳市眼科医院 暨南大学深圳眼科医院,深圳 518040
  • 收稿日期:2024-09-02 出版日期:2025-02-22 发布日期:2025-02-20
  • 通讯作者: 樊宁,Email:szfanning@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(82271087);深圳市科技计划(KCXFZ20230731093359004)

Progress in the application of different diagnostic instruments for preoperative assessment of lens zonule functionality

Tao Yufei1,  Pan Xiaohua2,  Jin Aixia2,  Fan Ning2   

  1. 1 The Second Clinical Medical College,  Jinan University, Shenzhen  518040, China; 2 Shenzhen Eye Hospital,  Jinan University,Shenzhen  518040, China
  • Received:2024-09-02 Online:2025-02-22 Published:2025-02-20
  • Contact: Fan Ning, Email: szfanning@126.com
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China (82271087); Shenzhen Science and Technology Program (KCXFZ20230731093359004)

摘要: 晶状体悬韧带对维持晶状体正常位置和形态发挥重要作用。晶状体悬韧带松弛或断裂可导致前房深度变化、眼压升高、房角关闭、晶状体半脱位。晶状体悬韧带功能异常在闭角型青光眼、高度近视等人群中高发且隐匿,给白内障手术带来很大挑战,并影响术后视力恢复。目前临床上可利用超声生物显微镜(ultrasound biomicroscopy, UBM)、扫频眼前段相干光断层扫描仪(swept-source anterior segment optical coherence tomography, SS-AS-OCT)CASIA2和基于Scheimpflug照相机原理的三维眼前节分析仪Pentacam等仪器检测评估晶状体悬韧带的功能。UBM可直接探测断裂的晶状体悬韧带、直接评估悬韧带断裂的位置,但检查需要患者配合眼球运动。CASIA2非接触性测量眼前房深度、晶状体前表面曲率半径、晶状体厚度、晶状体倾斜和偏心度等参数间接评估晶状体悬韧带功能,但无法测量后房及睫状体等组织形态。Pentacam与CASIA2类似,但检测指标不如后者齐全,且测量易受睫状体形态等因素影响。本文对比了三种检测仪器评估晶状体悬韧带功能的优缺点,指导临床医生在白内障术前及早发现晶状体悬韧带功能异常,从而加深对眼部病变的认识。 (国际眼科纵览,2025,  49:8-12)

关键词: 晶状体悬韧带, 超声生物显微镜, 扫频源前段相干光断层扫描仪, CASIA2, Pentacam

Abstract: The lens zonules play a crucial role in maintaining the normal position and shape of the lens. Laxity or rupture of the lens zonules can lead to adverse outcomes such as changes in anterior chamber depth,  increased intraocular pressure,  angle closure,  and partial dislocation of the lens. Abnormalities in lens zonule functionality are prevalent and often concealed in populations with high myopia and angle-closure glaucoma,  presenting significant challenges to cataract surgery. These abnormalities can lead to complications during surgery,  such as difficulty in capsulorhexis,  posterior capsule rupture,  and dropping of the lens into the vitreous cavity. Therefore,  preoperative assessment of lens zonule function is critically important. Currently,  clinical tools such as Ultrasound Biomicroscopy (UBM),  the new generation Swept-source anterior segment optical coherence tomography (SS-AS-OCT),  CASIA2,  and the Pentacam,  which is based on the principle of the Scheimpflug camera and analyzes the anterior segment in three dimensions,  are available for detecting and assessing the function of the lens zonules. UBM can directly detect ruptured lens zonules and assess the location of zonular ruptures but requires patient cooperation for eye movement during the examination. CASIA2,  a non-contact measurement device,  indirectly evaluates lens zonular function by measuring parameters such as anterior chamber depth,  anterior lens surface curvature radius,  lens thickness,  lens tilt,  and decentration,  but it cannot measure the posterior chamber and ciliary body morphology. Similar to CASIA2,  Pentacam assesses lens zonular function but has less comprehensive detection indicators and is prone to measurement errors influenced by factors such as ciliary body morphology. This article compares the advantages and disadvantages of these three instruments in assessing lens zonular function,  guiding clinicians to detect abnormalities in lens zonular function early,  particularly before cataract surgery,  thereby enhancing understanding of ocular pathologies.  (Int Rev Ophthalmol,  2025,  49:  8-12)

Key words: lens zonule, ultrasound biomicroscopy, swept-source anterior segment optical coherence tomography, CASIA2, Pentacam