国际眼科纵览 ›› 2023, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (2): 97-103.doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-5803.2023.02.001

• 系统性综述 •    下一篇

亚临床圆锥角膜的诊断标准

蒋晗笑1,2  许叶圣2  郑利斌2  姚玉峰2   

  1. 1浙江大学医学院附属第四医院眼科,浙江义乌 322000;2浙江大学医学院附属邵逸夫医院眼科 浙江省角膜病研究重点实验室,杭州 310018

  • 收稿日期:2022-11-21 出版日期:2023-04-22 发布日期:2023-04-22
  • 通讯作者: 姚玉峰,Email:yaoyf@zju.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(U20A20387);浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目(2019ZD040

A systematic review of diagnostic criteria for subclinical keratoconus

Jiang Hanxiao1, 2, Xu Yesheng2, Zheng Libin2, Yao Yufeng2   

  1. 1Department of Ophthalmology, The Fourth Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Yiwu Zhejiang 322000, China;  2 Department of Ophthalmology, Zhejiang Province Key Laboratory of Corneal Disease Research, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine,Hangzhou 310018, China
  • Received:2022-11-21 Online:2023-04-22 Published:2023-04-22
  • Contact: Yao Yufeng, Email: yaoyf@zju.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation (U20A20387); Zhejiang Medical and Health Science and Technology Plan Project (2019ZD040)

摘要: 目的 确定已发表文章中亚临床圆锥角膜的诊断标准。方法 对PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、Embase数据库、中国知网、万方数据库和维普中文科技期刊全文数据库2000年1月至2022年3月的所有使用关键词“亚临床圆锥角膜(subclinical keratoconus)”的研究进行系统性综述。2位研究者分别对纳入的文献进行数据分析。文章纳入标准是分析的亚临床圆锥角膜样本量>20眼;包含亚临床圆锥角膜的诊断标准;采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估文献质量。对所选文献的诊断标准和使用的检查仪器进行分析。结果 初步搜索共收集263项研究,其中207项研究被排除在外。最常使用的亚临床圆锥角膜的诊断标准:对侧眼确诊圆锥角膜(66.07%,37/56);在裂隙灯显微镜下缺乏任何圆锥角膜相关的发现/体征(35.71%,20/56);在裂隙灯显微镜、角膜测量学、视网膜检影镜和直接检眼镜检查中显示正常的角膜(33.93%,19/56)。结论 目前缺乏统一的标准来定义亚临床圆锥角膜。最常用的亚临床圆锥角膜诊断标准组合为对侧眼确诊圆锥角膜+裂隙灯显微镜检查显示为正常的角膜。(国际眼科纵览,2023, 47:97-103)

关键词: 亚临床圆锥角膜, 诊断标准, 系统性综述

Abstract: Objective  To identify the diagnostic criteria used for the terms subclinical keratoconus in published articles. Methods  This was a systematic review of all research on the use of the keyword "subclinical keratoconus" in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase database, CNKI, Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform and China Science and Technology Journal Database from January 2000 to March 2022. Two independent reviewers analyzed the data. The inclusion criteria for articles included that a sample size of subclinical keratoconus eyes was greater than 20 eyes, they contained the definition of subclinical keratoconus, and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale(NOS) was used to evaluate the quality of literature. Inclusion criteria for definition and examination technology used of the selected articles were then analyzed. Results  A total of 263 studies were included, of which 207 were excluded. Definitions for subclinical keratoconus included that the criteria of having keratoconus in the fellow eye was in 66.07% (37 of 56) of the articles. Lacking of any keratoconus-related findings/signs in the slit-lamp biomicroscopy was in 35.71% (20 of 56). Normal-appearing corneal on slit-lamp biomicroscopy, or keratometry, or retinoscopy, or ophthalmoscopy was in 33.93% (19 of 56). Conclusions  This review demonstrates the lack of unified criteria to define subclinical keratoconus. According to the literature review, the most common subclinical keratoconus definition used refers to an eye with keratoconus in the fellow eye and normal-appearing corneal on slit-lamp biomicroscopy.(Int Rev Ophthalmol, 2023, 47: 97-103)

Key words: subclinical keratoconus, diagnostic criteria, systematic review