眼科

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

应用眼动仪评价观看线偏光液晶电视与圆偏光液晶电视诱导的视疲劳研究

张莉  徐亮  张运红  李建军   

  1. 100005首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院 北京同仁眼科中心 北京市眼科研究所 眼科学与视觉科学北京市重点实验室(张莉、徐亮、李建军);中国标准研究院(张运红)
  • 收稿日期:2015-01-12 出版日期:2016-01-25 发布日期:2016-01-28
  • 通讯作者: 徐亮,Email:xlbio1@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    国家科技支撑计划项目(2011BAH15B08、2012BAH05F05、2012BAI23B07);首都卫生发展科研专项项目(2011-1016-06)

Study on human visual fatigue induced by watching linear polarized liquid crystal display and circular polarized liquid crystal display with eye tracker 

ZHANG Li1, XU Liang1, ZHANG Yun-hong2, LI Jian-jun1.   

  1. 1. Beijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100005, China; 2.National Institute of Standardization, Beijng 100086, China
  • Received:2015-01-12 Online:2016-01-25 Published:2016-01-28
  • Contact: XU Liang,Email:xlbio1@163.com

摘要:

目的 探讨应用眼动仪评价观看两种偏振光液晶电视对人眼视觉舒适度影响的差异。设计 实验研究。研究对象 屈光状态为正视眼的健康受试者60例。方法 受试者随机分两组,分别观看线偏振光液晶电视显示的视频内容(线偏组,30例)和圆偏振光液晶电视显示的视频内容(圆偏组,30例)。记录受试者在观看两种偏振光液晶电视视频时的眨眼频率、眨眼持续时间的变化。主要指标 眼动仪记录观看视频中的眨眼频率和眨眼持续时间。结果 两组受试者随观看时间延长,眨眼频率均呈现先下降再上升的趋势。在观看视频的初期时段,线偏组眨眼频率从初始时15.83次/分降至13.95次/分,圆偏组从初始时13.93次/分降至11.46次/分。随观看时间延长,两组眨眼频率均增加,观看末期时段,线偏组眨眼频率22.63次/分,圆偏组16.33次/分。线偏组与圆偏组眨眼持续时间初始阶段为2272毫秒/分、2001毫秒/分,结束时段为4084毫秒/分、2596毫秒/分。线偏组与圆偏组的眨眼频率、眨眼持续时间在观看视频前后的差值比较(P=0.030、0.031),线偏组的眨眼频率、眨眼持续时间变化较圆偏组显著。 结论 观看两种偏振光电视视频内容后受试者的眨眼频率和眨眼持续时间均较观看前有所增加,观看圆偏光液晶电视时诱导的视疲劳较观看线偏光液晶电视的视疲劳程度略轻。(眼科,2016,25: 63-67)

关键词: 眼动仪, 视疲劳, 眨眼频率, 眨眼持续时间

Abstract:

Objective To explore the different effects on human visual fatigue induced by watching linear polarized liquid crystal display(LCD) and circular polarized using eye movement analysis. Design Experimental study. Participants 60 healthy young subjects whose refractive status are emmetropia. Methods 60 subjects were divided into two groups randomly. Two groups were arranged to view linear polarized LCD and circular polarized LCD respectively, blinking frequency and blink duration time were recorded using eye tracker. Main Outcome Measures The real time eye movement parameters blink frequency and blink duration time. Results While viewing the video, blink frequency and blink duration time of two groups decreased at first and then increased till the end. Blink frequency of the linear polarized group decreased to 13.95 times/min from the original 15.83 times/min, blink frequency of the circular polarized group decreased to 11.46 times/min from the original 13.93 times/min. Blind frequency of two groups increased at the latter period because of visual fatigue, blink frequency of the linear polarized was 22.63 times/min at the end of stage, and blink frequency of the circular polarized group was 16.33 times/min. Blink duration time of the linear polarized group ranged from 2272 milliseconds/min at the beginning to 4084 milliseconds/min at the end of stage. Blink duration time of the circular polarized group ranged from 2001 milliseconds/min at the beginning to 2596 milliseconds/min at the end of stage. The changes of blink frequency and blink duration time before and after viewing the video in two groups was statistically significant with P value 0.030 and 0.031 respectively. Conclusion While viewing video, blink frequency and blink duration time of two groups decrease at first and then increase in the overall trend, the changes of blink frequency and blink duration time of the linear polarized group were significantly higher than those of the circular polarized group. Circular polarized LCD causes less visual fatigue. (Ophthalmol CHN, 2016, 25: 63-67)

Key words: eye tracker, visual fatigue, blink frequency, blink duration time