眼科 ›› 2026, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (1): 70-75.doi: 10.13281/j.cnki.issn.1004-4469.2026.01.012

• 教学园地 • 上一篇    下一篇

通过“组团式”援藏探讨西藏自治区白内障显微手术培训模式

岑羽捷1 韩亮1 次仁琼达2 范翔1   

  1. 1北京大学第三医院眼科,北京 100191;2西藏自治区人民医院眼科,拉萨 850000
  • 收稿日期:2025-07-25 出版日期:2026-01-25 发布日期:2026-01-13
  • 通讯作者: 范翔,Email:fanxiang@126.com E-mail: fanxiang@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金青年项目(82301268);西藏自治区自然科学基金组团式医学援藏项目[XZZR202402045(W);[XZ2023ZR-ZY23(Z)]]

Insights for the training mode of cataract microsurgery in Xizang(Tibet) Autonomous Region through the "Group-based" Medical Aid Program

Cen Yujie1, Han Liang1, Ciren Qiongda2, Fan Xiang1   

  1. 1 Department of Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China; 2 Department of Ophthalmology, People’s Hospital of Xizang Autonomous Region, Lhasa 850000, China
  • Received:2025-07-25 Online:2026-01-25 Published:2026-01-13
  • Contact: Fan Xiang, Email: fanxiang@126.com E-mail: fanxiang@126.com
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China (82301268); Group-based Medical Aid Program for Xizang of Xizang Autonomous Region Natural Science Foundation [XZZR202402045(W); XZ2023ZR- ZY23(Z)]

摘要: 目的 通过“组团式”援藏项目调研当前西藏自治区白内障手术培训现状和存在的问题,以期提高西藏眼科医生的白内障显微手术能力。设计 调查研究。研究对象 51名在藏工作眼科医生和5名援藏专家。方法 对所有研究对象进行调研访谈,并向在藏眼科医生发放调查问卷。依据在藏医生能否独立完成白内障显微手术进行分组,对比两组医生的手术培训路径差异。主要指标 在藏眼科医生白内障显微手术学习路径,西藏白内障显微手术特点及与内地手术的差异,西藏白内障显微手术培训现状与困难。结果 西藏地区白内障显微手术培训模式以传统“师带徒”为主,在藏医生赴内地进修和援藏医生进藏带教互相配合。藏区可独立完成白内障显微手术医生的手术学习周期(3.4±0.4)年,能独立手术医生组赴内地进修手术的比例(51.9%)显著高于尚不能独立手术医生组(25.0%)(P=0.05)。63.0%藏区眼科医生最有把握的白内障术式为小切口白内障囊外摘除术,对超声乳化术式的掌握相对落后。结论 西藏地区当前白内障显微手术培训模式单一,培训效率较低,亟待改善。

关键词: 援藏/组团式, 白内障显微手术, 培训方式

Abstract: Objective To explore training patterns for cataract microsurgery in Xizang(Tibet) through the Group-based Medical Aid Program, aiming to enhance the microsurgical skills of ophthalmologists in the Xizang Autonomous Region(XAR). Design Survey research. Participants 51 ophthalmologists working in Xizang and 5 aid experts. Methods All subjects underwent interviews, and questionnaires were distributed to ophthalmologists in XAR. Participants were grouped based on their ability to independently perform cataract microsurgery, with comparative analysis of training pathways between groups. Main Outcome Measures Learning pathways for cataract microsurgery among XAR ophthalmologists; characteristics of cataract microsurgery in XAR and differences from mainland practices; current status and challenges in cataract microsurgery training in XAR. Results The primary training model for cataract microsurgery in XAR is the traditional “master-apprentice” approach, supplemented by Xizang doctors undergoing training in mainland China and medical experts from other regions providing on-site instruction in XAR. The average learning period for Xizang doctors to independently perform cataract microsurgery was (3.4±0.4) years. Training in mainland China significantly improved surgical skills among Xizang ophthalmologists, the proportion of surgeons in the group capable of performing independent surgeries who underwent training in mainland China (51.9%) was significantly higher than that in the group not yet capable of performing independent surgeries (25.0%) (P=0.05). 63.0% of Xizang ophthalmologists reported feeling most confident in performing small-incision extracapsular cataract extraction, while mastery of phacoemulsification techniques lagged. Conclusion The current cataract microsurgery training model in Tibet is limited and inefficient, requiring urgent improvement.

Key words: Group-based Medical Aid Program/Xizang Autonomous Region, Cataract microsurgery, Training patterns