眼科 ›› 2025, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (2): 131-136.doi: 10.13281/j.cnki.issn.1004-4469.2025.02.007

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

促红细胞生成素治疗外伤性视神经病变的疗效观察

王宇航1, 2   徐歆桐1, 2   李雨雨2   陈碧玥1,2   孙明明  徐全刚2   周欢粉2   魏世辉2   

  1. 1解放军医学院,北京100853; 2 解放军总医院第三医学中心眼科医学部,北京 100853
  • 收稿日期:2025-02-06 出版日期:2025-03-25 发布日期:2025-03-13
  • 通讯作者: 魏世辉,Email: weishihui706@hotmail.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(2022YFA1105503)

Exploration of the efficacy of erythropoietin in the treatment of traumatic optic neuropathy

Wang Yuhang1,2, Xu Xintong1,2, Li Yuyu2, Chen Biyue1,2, Sun Mingming2, Xu Quangang2, Zhou Huanfen2, Wei Shihui2   

  1. 1 The Chinese People’s Liberation Army Medical School, Beijing 100853, China; 2 Department of Ophthalmology, The Third Medical Center of Chinese People’s Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
  • Received:2025-02-06 Online:2025-03-25 Published:2025-03-13
  • Contact: Wei Shihui, Email: weishihui706@hotmail.com
  • Supported by:
    National Key R&D Program of China (2022YFA1105503)

摘要:  目的  评估促红细胞生成素(EPO)治疗外伤性视神经病变(TON)的效果。设计  单中心非随机同期对照研究。研究对象 2019年1月至2024年1月于解放军总医院眼科住院的TON患者85例(95眼)。方法  根据患者是否同意行EPO治疗,将其分为EPO治疗组45例(50眼)和对照组40例(45眼),所有患者均行营养神经及改善微循环治疗。EPO治疗组连续三天静脉滴注EPO,对照组未行此治疗及其他治疗。治疗后3个月和≥12个月对患者进行随访,收集两组患者人口学特征、临床资料及治疗前后最佳矫正视力(BCVA)。比较两组患者视力预后,通过单因素和多因素分析探讨其影响因素(治疗方式、年龄、性别、光感、视力下降时间、昏迷史、异常FVEP,是否合并蝶窦或筛窦积血、眼眶骨折或血肿及视神经管骨折,有无视神经管减压术史和糖皮质激素治疗史等),并记录EPO的不良反应。视力改善定义为随访时BCVA下降≥0.3 LogMAR。主要指标  治疗前后BCVA、疗效影响因素、不良反应。结果 治疗3个月时EPO治疗组有26眼(52.0%)视力改善,显著高于对照组的13眼(28.9%)(χ2=5.228,P=0.022);治疗后≥12个月时,EPO治疗组28眼(56.0%)视力改善,对照组无变化,两组间差异具有统计学意义(χ2=7.096, P=0.008)。治疗后≥12个月时EPO治疗组中5例(5眼)BCVA仍有改善,其中2例(2眼)治疗后3个月时视力无改善。治疗方式、年龄、合并蝶窦或筛窦积血及异常FVEP均与视力预后显著相关(P均<0.05)。EPO治疗组中未见显著不良反应。结论 EPO治疗TON可以一定程度改善患者的视力预后,可作为TON的一种临床辅助治疗手段。(眼科,2025,34: 131-136)

关键词: 促红细胞生成素, 外伤性视神经病变

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the efficacy of erythropoietin (EPO) in the treatment of traumatic optic neuropathy (TON). Design A single-center, non-randomized, concurrent controlled study. Participants 85 TON patients (95 eyes) hospitalized in the Department of Ophthalmology at PLA General Hospital between January 2019 and January 2024. Methods Patients were divided into an EPO treatment group (45 cases, 50 eyes) and a control group (40 cases, 45 eyes) based on their consent to receive EPO therapy. All patients received neurotrophic and microcirculation-improving treatments. The EPO group received intravenous EPO for three consecutive days, while the control group did not undergo this or additional therapies. Follow-ups were conducted at 3 months and ≥12 months post-treatment. Demographic characteristics, clinical data, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) before and after treatment were collected. Visual prognosis was compared between groups, and influencing factors (treatment modality, age, sex, light perception, time to vision loss, history of coma, abnormal FVEP, presence of sphenoid/ethmoid sinus hemorrhage, orbital fractures/hematoma, optic canal fractures, history of optic canal decompression, and glucocorticoid therapy) were analyzed via univariate and multivariate analyses. Adverse effects of EPO were recorded. Visual improvement was defined as a BCVA decline of ≥0.3 LogMAR at follow-up. Main Outcome Measures BCVA before and after treatment, factors influencing efficacy, and adverse reactions. Results At 3 months post-treatment, 26 eyes (52.0%) in the EPO group showed visual improvement, significantly higher than 13 eyes (28.9%) in the control group (χ2=5.228, P=0.022). At ≥12 months post-treatment, 28 eyes (56.0%) in the EPO group demonstrated improvement, while the control group showed no changes, with a statistically significant difference (χ2=7.096, P=0.008). Five eyes in the EPO group exhibited continued BCVA improvement at ≥12 months, including 2 eyes without improvement at 3 months. Treatment modality, age, presence of sphenoid/ethmoid sinus hemorrhage, and abnormal FVEP were significantly associated with visual prognosis (all P<0.05). No significant adverse reactions were observed in the EPO group. Conclusion EPO therapy can moderately improve visual prognosis in TON patients and may serve as a clinical adjunctive treatment for TON. (Ophthalmol CHN, 2025, 34: 131-136)

Key words:  erythropoietin, traumatic optic neuropathy