眼科 ›› 2012, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (4): 264-267.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

玻璃体切割联合白内障超声乳化手术后的近期眼压改变

李纳  马凯  崔蕊    

  1. 100730首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院 北京同仁眼科中心 首都医科大学眼科学院 北京市眼科学与视觉科学重点实验室(王凤华、王宁利);河北省邯郸市眼科医院(邯郸市第三医院)(申然、孙兰萍、郭黎霞);香港中文大学眼科与视觉科学学系(彭忆、梁远波)
  • 收稿日期:2012-05-01 出版日期:2012-07-25 发布日期:2012-07-27
  • 通讯作者: 李纳,Email:wmzina@hotmail.com

Short-term change of intraocular pressure after vitrectomy combined phacoemulsification

LI Na, MA Kai, CUI Ru.   

  1. Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University; Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Lab., Beijing 100730, China
  • Received:2012-05-01 Online:2012-07-25 Published:2012-07-27
  • Contact: LI Na, Email: wmzina@hotmail.com

摘要: 【摘要】 目的 探讨玻璃体切割联合白内障超声乳化摘除人工晶状体(IOL)植入术后的近期眼压改变。设计 回顾性比较性病例系列。研究对象2010年北京同仁医院眼科住院施行玻璃体切割术的连续病例102例106眼。方法 回顾因玻璃体积血或黄斑疾病行标准20G玻璃体切割联合(30例32眼)或不联合(70例74眼)白内障超声乳化摘除IOL植入术的病例资料,排除患有其他可能影响眼压的疾病者。比较两组间术后3天的眼压变化情况。主要指标 眼压值。结果 联合白内障手术组与单纯玻璃体切割术组相比,术前眼压分别为(13.8±3.9)和(14.5±3.0)mm Hg,无显著性差异(P=0.319);术后第1天(16.4±9.1)、(16.4±9.1)mm Hg,第2天(13.9±5.6)、(14.7±5.1)mm Hg,第3天(13.1±4.4)、(13.8±4.6)mm Hg的平均眼压均无显著性差异(P均>0.05)。但单纯玻璃体切割术组术后第1天平均眼压较术前显著升高。两组术后高眼压发生率(15.6%、27.1%)无显著差别,80%和90%发生于术后第1天。联合手术组中术后高眼压(5眼)均为糖尿病视网膜病变者。结论 联合白内障超声乳化手术并不显著增加玻璃体切割手术后的近期眼压水平及高眼压发生率。(眼科,2012,21:264-267)

关键词: 玻璃体切割术, 白内障摘除术, 眼压

Abstract: 【Abstract】 Objective To evaluate the short-term change of intraocular pressure (IOP) after vitrectomy combined with phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. Design Retrospective comparative cases series. Participants 106 eyes of 102 consecutive inpatients who had undergone vitrectomy in Department of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Hospital  in 2010. Methods The cases with vitreous hemorrhage/opacity or macular disease who had undergone standard 20 gauge pars plana vitrectomy combined with phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation (32 eyes of 30 patients) or without (74 eyes of 70 patients), excluding the cases with preoperative medical history of any possible effects on IOP. Main Outcome Measures IOP. Results Compared the combined cataract operation group with single vitrectomy group, the preoperative IOP (13.8±3.9, 14.5±3.0 mm Hg) had no significant difference (P=0.319), the average IOP of postoperative day 1 (16.4±9.1, 16.4±9.1 mm Hg), day 2 (13.9±5.6, 14.7±5.1 mm Hg) and day 3 (13.1±4.4, 13.8±4.6 mm Hg) had no significant difference (P>0.05 for each). Average IOP of postoperative day 1 was significantly higher than the preoperative one in the single vitrectomy group. Postoperative ocular hypertension incidence (15.6% vs 27.1%) in the two groups had no significant difference, which both mainly (80% vs 90%) occurred on the first postoperative day. All the five cases with ocular hypertension in the combined group occurred in eyes with diabetic retinopathy. Conclusion Combined with cataract surgery does not significantly increase the recent IOP and the incidence of ocular hypertension after vitrectomy. (Ophthalmol CHN, 2012, 21: 264-267)

Key words: vitrectomy, cataract extraction, intraocular pressure