眼科 ›› 2023, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (3): 192-196.doi: 10.13281/j.cnki.issn.1004-4469.2023.03.003

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

人工晶状体眼伴有PVR C1以下孔源性视网膜脱离的手术方式选择

于亚杰 郑鹏飞 张珂 周海英 刘武   

  1. 首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院 北京同仁眼科中心 眼科学与视觉科学北京市重点实验室100730
  • 收稿日期:2023-02-25 出版日期:2023-05-25 发布日期:2023-06-09
  • 通讯作者: 刘武,Email:trliuwu@ccmu.edu.cn E-mail:trliuwu@ccmu.edu.cn

Surgical choice of retinal retinal detachment below PVR C1 in intraocular lens eyes

Yu Yajie, Zheng Pengfei, Zhang Ke, Zhou Haiying, Liu Wu   

  1. Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University; Beijing Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Beijng 100730, China
  • Received:2023-02-25 Online:2023-05-25 Published:2023-06-09
  • Contact: Liu Wu, Email: trliuwu@ccmu.edu.cn E-mail:trliuwu@ccmu.edu.cn

摘要: 目的 观察比较巩膜扣带术(SB)和经睫状体平部玻璃体切除术(PPV)对伴有增生性玻璃体视网膜病变(PVR)C1级以下的孔源性视网膜脱离的人工晶状体眼的术后效果,并对该类患者的手术方式选择进行分析。设计 回顾性病例系列。研究对象 北京同仁医院南区就诊伴有PVR C1以下孔源性视网膜脱离的人工晶状体眼患者156例(156眼)。方法 回顾患者病历资料,按手术方式分为SB组(44眼)和PPV组(112眼),记录两组患者的一般资料、眼别、视网膜脱离时间、视网膜裂孔数量及形态、PVR分期等,观察并比较两组术后6个月时视网膜解剖复位情况(首次手术复位率及最终复位率)、最佳矫正视力(BCVA)及二次手术的情况,并分析二次手术的原因。主要指标 视网膜脱离复位率、BCVA及二次手术情况。结果 术前SB组和PPV组在性别、眼别、视网膜脱离时间、视网膜裂孔数量及形态、PVR分期均无统计学差异(P均>0.05)。SB组和PPV组首次术后视网膜复位率分别为77.3%(34/44眼)和92.9%(104/112眼)(χ2=7.52,P=0.006)。视网膜未成功复位的患者均行二次玻璃体切除术,最终两组所有患眼视网膜全部复位(100%)。在SB组首次手术视网膜未复位的病例中,除1例为新发视网膜裂孔,其余患者视网膜裂孔均位于环扎嵴上,视网膜未复位的原因均与PVR进展相关。在PPV组,首次术后视网膜未复位的原因也与术后PVR相关。SB组手术前后的BCVA分别为1.1(0.70,1.80)和0.75(0.50,1.00)(P=0.003);PPV组手术前后BCVA分别为1.9(1.53,1.90)和0.7(0.50,1.00)(P<0.001)。两组术后BCVA无统计学差异(P=0.35)。结论 对于人工晶状体眼PVR C1以下孔源性视网膜脱离,术后PVR是影响手术成功率的重要相关因素。尽管SB术可以取得较好的手术效果,但PPV术在视网膜复位率上优于SB术。(眼科,2023, 32: 192-196)

关键词: 视网膜脱离/外科学, 人工晶状体眼, 巩膜扣带术, 玻璃体切除术

Abstract: Objective To observe and compare the anatomical and functional outcome of scleral buckling (SB) and pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) to treat the rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) with proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) grade C1 below in the intraocular lens (IOL) eyes. Design Retrospective case series. Participants 156 patients (156 eyes) with IOL diagnosed as RRD at the south district of Beijing Tongren Hospital were enrolled. Methods Review the patient records. According to the method of surgery, all patients included were divided into SB group (44 eyes) and PPV group (112 eyes). The general characteristics, left/right eyes, retinal detachment duration, number and shape of retinal holes, and the stage of PVR were recorded for both groups. The rate of retinal reattachment (after primary and final surgery), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and secondary surgery were observed and compared between the two groups at 6 months after surgery. We also analyzed the reasons for the second surgery. Main Outcome Measures The rate of retinal reattachment, BCVA, and secondary surgery at 6 months after primary surgery. Results There was no difference in gender, left/ right eyes, retinal detachment duration, number and shape of retinal holes, and the stage of (PVR) between SB group and PPV group (all P>0.05). The rate of retina reattachment after the initial surgery was 77.3% (34/44) in SB group, and 92.9% (104/112) in PPV group (χ2=7.52,P=0.006). The secondary PPV was underwent for the patients without retinal reattachment, and finally, all of them achieved anatomical success. In the cases with unattached retina after the primary surgery in SB group, except for one new retinal hole, the rest retinal holes were all located on the encircling ridge. The absence of retina reattachment was associated with the progression of PVR. In the PPV group, the unattached retina after the primary surgery was also associated with postoperative PVR. The BCVA (LogMAR) before and after surgery in the SB group were 1.1 (0.70, 1.80) and 0.75 (0.50, 1.00), respectively (P=0.003). And in PPV group, the BCVA (LogMAR) before and after surgery were 1.9 (1.53, 1.90) and 0.7 (0.50, 1.00), respectively (P<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative BCVA between these two groups (P=0.35). Conclusion For RRD with PVR less severe than grade C1 in IOL eyes, postoperative PVR is an important factor that affects the success rate of surgery. Although SB can achieve good surgical efficiency, PPV is superior to SB surgery in terms of retinal reattachment rate. (Ophthalmol CHN, 2023, 32: 192-196)

Key words: retinal detachment/sugery, intraocular lens, scleral buckling, pars plana vitrectomy