眼科 ›› 2014, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (1): 37-42.doi: 10.13281/j.cnki.issn.1004-4469.2014.01.010

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

应用眼动仪评价观看立体显示视频诱导的视疲劳程度的实验研究 

张莉   任杰   徐亮   张景尚   赵晶   

  1. 100005首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院 北京同仁眼科中心 北京市眼科研究所 北京市眼科学与视觉科学重点实验室
  • 收稿日期:2013-12-15 出版日期:2014-01-25 发布日期:2014-01-22
  • 通讯作者: 徐亮,Email:xlbio1@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    国家科技支撑计划课题(2012BAI23B07);首都卫生发展科研专项基金(2011-2016-06)
      

Visual comfort and fatigue measured by eye movement analysis when watching three-dimensional displays

ZHANG  Li,   Ren-Jie,   Xu-Liang,   Zhang-Jing-Shang,   Zhao-Jing   

  1.  Beijing Institute of Ophthalmology; Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Lab.;Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100005, China
  • Received:2013-12-15 Online:2014-01-25 Published:2014-01-22
  • Contact: XU Liang, Email: xlbio1@163.com

摘要: 目的 探讨应用眼动仪评价观看立体显示(three dimensional, 3D)视频诱导的视疲劳程度的作用。设计 观察性交叉研究。 研究对象  28例健康受试者,年龄20~30岁之间,-3.0 D <屈光状态<+1.0 D。方法 受试者在实验中观看偏振光原理的3D显示器。显示器可分别以二维(two dimensional,2D)和三维两种方式显示观看内容。观看视频前安装好眼动仪设备,每位受试者分2次观看相同内容2D显示及3D显示视频各40分钟,用眼动仪实时记录观看视频中的各项眼动指标变化,并比较观看3D和2D视频时眼动指标的差异。主要指标 眨眼频率与眨眼持续时间、注视持续时间、瞳孔直径、眼跳速度与加速度、眼跳持续时间、眼跳幅度。结果 在观看3D视频中眨眼频率明显低于观看2D视频(左眼:P=0.02,右眼:P=0.01),随着观看3D时间的延长,眨眼频率增加,而观看2D过程中眨眼频率无明显变化。眨眼持续时间在观看2D和3D过程中无明显差异。观看2D和3D视频过程中瞳孔大小无明显差异(左眼:  P=0.86; 右眼:P=0.64)。观看3D过程中每个注视点的注视持续时间短于观看2D视频(左眼:  P=0.02, 右眼: P=0.02)。 观看3D和2D过程中注视持续时间双眼无差异 (3D: P=0.94 ; 2D: P=0.98)。观看3D和2D过程中眼跳各项参数(眼跳频率、持续时间、幅度、速度与加速度)均有明显差异  (P<0.001),与观看2D视频相比,在观看3D视频过程中,眼跳幅度较大,眼跳频率较快,眼跳持续时间较短,眼跳速度较快。随着观看3D视频时间延长,眼跳频率下降,从最初平均每分钟980.8个眼跳(左眼)到最后平均每分钟937.2个眼跳(左眼)。左右眼的眼跳幅度无明显差异(2D: P=0.94; 3D: P=0.65),左右眼的眼跳速度无明显差异(2D: P=0.90; 3D: P=0.82)。结论 观看3D视频会使眨眼频率减少,眼跳速度加快,眼跳频率及幅度增加,而瞳孔直径在观看2D与3D视频间无明显差异。观看3D视频40分钟终末阶段,所有数值增加的眼跳参数趋于与观看2D视频相同的水平,表明观看40分钟3D视频引起的眼动参数变化与关注度提高有关。(眼科,2014,23: 37-42)

关键词: 立体视觉, 眨眼, 注视, 眼跳, 瞳孔大小

Abstract: Objective To assess and compare visual fatigue and visual discomfort induced by viewing stereoscopic displays using eye movement analysis. Design Observational cross-over study. Participants Twenty eight healthy subjects (age: 20~30 years), -3.0D  < refractive error <+1.0 D. Methods Three dimensional (3D) displays used the pattern retarder-spatial domain technology with linearly polarized three dimensional technologies. During this study performed at two subsequent days, 28 subjects watched a video shown on a 3D display or a two-dimensional (2D) display. Main Outcome Measures Blink frequency and duration, fixation duration, pupil size, and saccade frequency, duration, speed and amplitude of the saccades.  Results Blinking frequency was significantly lower when watching 3D display than watching the 2D display (left eye: P=0.02; right eye P=0.01). With increasing duration of watching the movie, blinking frequency increased during the 3D watching and remained unchanged during the 2D watching. Blinking duration did not differ significantly between the 3D watching and 2D watching.  Pupil diameter did not differ significantly between 2D viewing and 3D viewing (left eye, P=0.86; right eye P=0.64).  Fixation duration was significantly shorter during 3D viewing than during 2-dimensional viewing (left eye, P=0.02, and right eye P=0.02). Fixation duration did not differ significantly between the two eyes (P=0.94 for 3D viewing and P=0.98 for 2D viewing). The saccade parameters (frequency, duration, amplitude, velocity and acceleration) differed significantly between 3D viewing and 2D viewing.  Except for the difference in the saccade duration (P=0.046 for the left eye; P=0.035 for the right eye), all other parameters of the saccade measurements (frequency, saccade amplitude, saccade velocity and acceleration) showed highly significant differences between 3D viewing and 2D viewing (All P<0.001). Compared to 2D viewing, 3D viewing  was associated with a higher saccade amplitude, higher saccade frequency, shorter saccade duration and faster saccade speed.  The mean saccade frequency decreased from 980.8 / minute (left eye) in the first 5 min interval to 937.2 / minute (left eye) in the last 5 minute interval during the 3D viewing.  Saccade amplitude between the left eye and the right eyes did not differ significantly (P=0.94 for 2D viewing, and P=0.65 for 3D viewing). Saccade speed between two eyes did not vary significantly (P=0.90 for 2D viewing, and P=0.82 for 3D viewing). Conclusion 3D viewing, as compared with 2D viewing, was associated with lower blinking frequency, faster saccadic speed, higher saccadic frequency, and larger saccadic amplitude, while pupil size did not vary between them.  At the end stage of the 3D movie session, the increased values decreased to supra-normal values. This pattern of eye movements suggests that 3D viewing of movies, as compared to 2D viewing, is associated with an increased level of alertness which decreases to supra-normal values after 40 minutes of watching.  (Ophthalmol CHN, 2014, 23: 37-42)

Key words: stereoscopic viewing, blink, fixation, saccade, pupil size