眼科 ›› 2015, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (3): 202-205.doi: 10.13281/j.cnki.issn.1004-4469.2015.03.015

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

2型糖尿病患者糖尿病视网膜病变的家族聚集性研究

柴歆 孙婷 郝琳娜 肖媛媛 李辽青 李毅斌   

  1. 100005 首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院 北京同仁眼科中心 北京市眼科研究所 眼科学与视觉科学北京市重点实验室
  • 收稿日期:2014-12-26 出版日期:2015-05-25 发布日期:2015-06-04
  • 通讯作者: 李毅斌,Email:yibinlee@yahoo.com E-mail:yibinlee@yahoo.com
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金(81070733)

Familial aggregation of diabetic retinopathy in Chinese type 2 diabetic patients

CHAI Xin, SUN Ting, HAO Lin-na, XIAO Yuan-yuan, LI Liao-qing, LI Yi-bin   

摘要: 目的 探讨国人2型糖尿病患者中糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)发病是否具有家族聚集性。 设计 横断面研究。研究对象 一个直系血缘家庭中有≥2个2型糖尿病患病同胞,该家庭中所有的DM患病同胞均为研究对象。方法 采用遗传流行病学中家族聚集性分析方法将研究对象分成若干独立同胞对。根据先证者是否患DR分为两组,分别统计其同胞的罹患率,两个率的比值即为相对危险度,表示先证者有DR的同胞发病与先证者无DR的同胞发病的相对危险性。主要指标 罹患率、相对危险度。结果 2型糖尿病同胞家系103个,共计229人。先证者有DR时其同胞的DR罹患率为58.3%,先证者无DR时其同胞的DR罹患率为26.7%(P=0.002),相对危险度为3.411 ;先证者有PDR时其同胞的PDR罹患率与先证者无PDR时其同胞的PDR罹患率之间差异无统计学意义(P=0.812); Logistic回归分析显示,先证者合并DR(P=0.042,OR=2.811)、先证者同胞的糖尿病病程长(P=0.002,OR=1.143)是先证者同胞并发DR的主要危险因素,男性是先证者同胞并发DR的保护因素(P=0.037,OR=0.389)。 结论国人2型糖尿病中DR患病存在家族聚集性现象,而PDR的家族聚集性有待进一步研究。

关键词: text-indent: 0px, font: medium Simsun, white-space: normal, letter-spacing: normal, color: rgb(0, 0, 0), word-spacing: 0px, -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px" id="x-57-anchor" name="x-57-anchor">

2型糖尿病, 糖尿病视网膜病变, 家族聚集性

Abstract: Objective To study whether there was a familial aggregation of diabetic retinopathy (DR) among Chinese type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. Design cross-sectional study. Participants All DM siblings of the family were as the research objects if there were at least two diabetic siblings in the lineal and consanguineous family. Methods The research objects were divided into several independent siblings according to the familial aggregation analysis method of genetic epidemiology. The siblings were divided into two groups according to its proband with retinopathy or not, and the prevalence of DR among siblings was calculated. odds ratio (OR) was also calculated. Main Outcome Measures Prevalence and OR value. Results A total of 103 families (229 cases) were enrolled in the study. Prevalence of DR among siblings of probands with DR was 58.3% , while the prevalence of DR among siblings of probands without DR was 26.7% (P=0.002, OR=3.411). The difference between siblings of probands with NPDR and PDR didn’t reach statistical significance (P=0.812). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis revealed that long duration of diabetes (P=0.002, OR=1.143) and proband with DR (P=0.042, OR=2.811) were associated with an increased risk of DR in siblings, while male was associated with an decreased risk of DR in siblings (P=0.037, OR=0.389). Conclusion A familial aggregation of DR can be found in Chinese T2DM patients, however, a familial aggregation of PDR is worth further study.

Key words: text-indent: 0px, display: inline !important, font: medium Simsun, white-space: normal, float: none, letter-spacing: normal, color: rgb(0,0,0), word-spacing: 0px, -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px">type 2 diabetes mellitus, diabetic retinopathy; text-indent: 0px, font: medium Simsun, white-space: normal, letter-spacing: normal, color: rgb(0,0,0), word-spacing: 0px, -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px" class="x-5-3">familial atext-indent: 0px, display: inline !important, font: medium Simsun, white-space: normal, float: none, letter-spacing: normal, color: rgb(0,0,0), word-spacing: 0px, -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px">ggregation