眼科 ›› 2014, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (4): 251-255.doi: 10.13281/j.cnki.issn.1004-4469.2014.04.009

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

双眼集合持续状态时眼外肌的结构磁共振研究

焦永红  满凤媛  吕彬 王振常 赵堪兴   

  1. 100730首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院 北京同仁眼科中心 眼科学与视觉科学北京市重点实验室(焦永红),医学影像中心(满凤媛); 100190 中国科学院自动化研究所(吕彬); 100050 首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院(王振常); 300020天津医科大学眼科临床学院 天津市眼科医院(赵堪兴)
  • 收稿日期:2014-04-13 出版日期:2014-07-25 发布日期:2014-07-22
  • 通讯作者: 赵堪兴,Email:zkx4260@vip.163.com

Magnetic resonance imaging of human extraocular muscles during sustained convergence

JIAO Yong-hong1, MAN Feng-yuan2, LV Bin3, WANG Zhen-chang4, ZHAO Kan-xing5.   

  1. 1. Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Key Laboratory of Beijing Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100730, China; 2. Department of Radiology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100730, China; 3. Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; 4. Department of Radiology, Beijing Friedship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China; 5. Clinical College of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin Eye Hospital, Tianjin 300020, China
  • Received:2014-04-13 Online:2014-07-25 Published:2014-07-22
  • Contact: ZHAO Kan-xing, Email: zkx4260@vip.163.com

摘要: 目的 应用磁共振成像(MRI)研究对称和非对称集合运动时眼外肌的影像学特征。设计 实验研究。研究对象 平均年龄(27.4±3.1)岁的正常志愿受试者8人。方法 受试者先在非集合状态(不放置三棱镜)下进行眼眶水平、冠状、矢状位MRI扫描。然后分别在非对称性集合状态(将底向外的20△三棱镜置于右眼及左眼前)及对称性集合状态(双眼前各置底向外的10△三棱镜)下行眼眶三轴位MRI扫描。检查时受试者经45°反射角镜注视5 m处点光源以克服复视。主要指标 双眼集合时眼外肌收缩性变化和眼球转动角度。结果 非对称性集合状态下,集合眼(置三棱镜眼)平均内转11.03°±1.44°,内旋1.0°,对侧眼内转1.40°±0.46°。集合眼较非集合眼的外直肌有显著性舒张性变薄(截面面积分别是0.4710±0.1077与0.5155±0.1168 cm2,P=0.037),其他眼外肌无显著性伸缩改变。对称性集合状态下,双眼平均内转5.26°±1.15°,集合眼与非集合眼比较,各眼外肌无显著收缩性变化。结论 非对称性集合运动时,集合眼的外直肌舒张性变薄显著。对称性集合状态下和非对称性集合状态下,眼球内转幅度有显著性差异。(眼科, 2014, 23: 251-255)

关键词: 核磁共振成像, 眼外肌, 集合, 非对称性

Abstract: Objective To analyze magnetic resonance imaging data of the extraocular muscles in convergence. Design Experimental study. Participants Eight normal subjects aged (27.4±3.1) years. Methods Eight normal subjects, non-convergence state, asymmetrical convergence: a total amount of 20△ base-out prism was placement in front of the right eye or the left eye; symmetrical convergence: 10△ base-out prism was placement in front of both eyes. Extraocular muscles (EOMs) paths were evaluated by axial, coronal and sagittal MRI scans during the subject focus to a target at a distance of 5 m from the eye. Main Outcome Measures In convergence, the contractile changes of the EOMs and the converging eye rotated degrees. Results In asymmetrical convergence, the converging eye lateral rectus (LR) muscles exhibited significant relaxational thinning compared with the non-convergence eye (cross-sectional area were 0.4710±0.1077 and 0.5155±0.1168 cm2,P=0.037), while the other EOMs did not showed significant contractile changes. The converging eye rotated nasally 11.03±1.44°, the aligned eye rotated nasally 1.40±0.46°, and the converging eye showed 1.0° intorsion of the rectus pulley array. In symmetrical convergence, the eye rotated nasally 5.26±1.15°; there were no significant contractile changes in the cross sections of the EOMs. Conclusion The converging eye LR muscles exhibited large contractile cross-section changes. The significant changes of the eye rotation associated with the asymmetrical convergence and symmetrical convergence. (Ophthalmol CHN, 2014, 23: 251-255)

Key words: magnetic resonance imaging, extraocular muscles, convergence, asymmetrical