眼科 ›› 2021, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (6): 430-434.doi: 10.13281/j.cnki.issn.1004-4469.2021.06.005

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

全身糖皮质激素对非动脉炎性前部缺血性视神经病变患者视野的短期疗效

陈文瑜 艾明 陈婷   

  1. 武汉大学人民医院眼科 430060
  • 收稿日期:2021-07-09 出版日期:2021-11-25 发布日期:2021-12-10
  • 通讯作者: 艾明,Email:wan@whu.edu.cn E-mail:wan@whu.edu.cn

Short-term effect of systemic glucocorticoid on visual field in patients with non-arteriticanterior ischemic optic neuropathy

Chen Wenyu, Ai Ming, Chen Ting   

  1. Department of Ophthalmology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China
  • Received:2021-07-09 Online:2021-11-25 Published:2021-12-10
  • Contact: Ai Ming, Email: wan@whu.edu.cn E-mail:wan@whu.edu.cn

摘要: 目的 探讨全身糖皮质激素治疗对非动脉炎性前部缺血性视神经病变(non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy,NA-AION)患者视野的短期疗效。设计 回顾性病例系列。研究对象 2016年12月至2021年3月于武汉大学人民医院眼科中心确诊的NA-AION患者56例(98眼)。方法 根据患者意愿选择是否使用全身糖皮质激素治疗,并以此分为激素组(73眼)和对照组(25眼),并在治疗前和治疗后1个月内进行视野检查。根据改进版青光眼分析系统(Enhanced Glaucoma Staging System,GSS2),分别将患眼的视野缺损程度分期分为S0、border、S1、S2、S3、S4、S5。所有患者给予复方樟柳碱注射液及甲钴胺片改善循环、营养神经,同时激素组予以糖皮质激素冲击(静脉注射甲泼尼龙500~1000 mg)每天1次,连续使用3天后,酌情减量,5~7天后改为每天口服强的松龙(剂量为1 mg/kg/d),并逐渐减量(每3天减少10 mg)至停药。治疗后视野缺损程度分期上升1期及以上的患眼为治疗显效。比较治疗前后两组患者视野指数(visual field index,VFI)、视野平均缺损(mean deviation,MD)、模式标准差值(pattern standard deviation,PSD)、视野缺损程度分期和治疗显效率。主要指标VFI、MD、PSD、视野缺损程度分期和治疗显效率。结果 激素组和对照组在治疗后1个月内的VFI、MD无显著性差异[(57.62±24.40)% 对比(60.28±28.67)%,t=0.450,P=0.654; (-14.70±7.21)dB对比 (-14.20±9.06)dB,t=-0.280,P=0.780],而PSD的差异有统计学意义[(9.19±3.87)dB对比(7.37±3.20)dB,t=2.112,P=0.037]。两组间手术前后VFI差值、MD差值、PSD差值也无显著性差异[(8.38±15.976)%对比(6.24±17.290)%,t=0.567,P=0.572;( 2.04±4.71)dB对比(1.66±5.07)dB,t=0.338,P=0.736;( 0.38±2.60)dB对比(-0.04±2.46)dB,t=0.713,P=0.736]。治疗后激素组与对照组的视野缺损程度分期结果无显著性差异(Z=-1.423,P=0.155),治疗显效率的差异也无统计学意义(27.40%对比36.00%,χ2=0.724,P=0.696)。结论 全身糖皮质激素治疗不能改善NA-AION患者视野短期预后。(眼科,2021, 30: 430-434)

关键词: 缺血性视神经病变, 糖皮质激素, 视野

Abstract: Objective To investigate the short-term effect of systemic glucocorticoid therapy on visual field in patients with non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NA-AION). Design Retrospective case series. Participants 56 patients (98 eyes) with NA-AION were enrolled from Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University from December 2016 to March 2021. Methods The patients were divided into glucocorticoid group (73 eyes) and control group (25 eyes) according to whether they agreed to treated with systemic glucocorticoid. The visual field was examined before and within 1 month after treatment. According to the improved glaucoma staging system (GSS2), the visual field defect degree of the affected eyes was divided into S0, border, S1, S2, S3, S4 and S5. All patients were given compound anisodine hydrobromide injection and mecobalamin tablets to improve circulation and cellular nutrition. At the same time, the glucocorticoid group was given glucocorticoid pulse therapy (intravenous methylprednisolone 500~1000 mg) once a day. After continuous use for 3 days, it was reduced as appropriate. After 5~7 days, it was changed to oral prednisolone (1 mg/kg/d), and gradually reduced (10 mg every 3 days) until the drug was stopped. After treatment, the patients whose visual field defect degree increased by stage and more than 1 stage were the patients with effective treatment, and the ratio of the patients with effective treatment to the total patients in the group was the effective rate. Visual field index (VFI), mean defect (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD), visual field defect stage before and after treatment, and effective rate of treatment were compared between the two groups. Main Outcome Measures VEI, MD, PSD, visual field defect stage and effective rate of treatment. Results There was no significant difference in VFI and MD between glucocorticoid group and control group within 1 month after treatment [(57.62±24.40)% vs (60.28±28.67)%, t=0.450, P=0.654; (-14.70±7.21) dB vs (-14.20±9.06) dB, t=-0.280, P=0.780), while the difference of PSD was statistically significant [(9.19±3.87) dB vs (7.37±3.20) dB, t=2.112, P=0.037). The pre-posttreatment VFI difference, MD difference and PSD difference between glucocorticoid group and control group was not statistically significant [(8.38±15.976)% vs. (6.24±17.290)%, t=0.567, P=0.572; (2.04±4.71)dB vs (1.66±5.07) dB, t=0.338, P=0.736; (0.38±2.60) dB vs (-0.04±2.46) dB, t=0.713, P=0.736). After treatment, there was no significant difference in the staging of visual field defect between the glucocorticoid group and the control group (Z=-1.423, P=0.155), and there was no significant difference in the effective rate of treatment (27.40% vs 36.00%, χ2=0.724,P=0.696). Conclusion Systemic glucocorticoid therapy can not improve the short-term visual field prognosis of NA-AION patients. (Ophthalmol CHN, 2021, 30: 430-434)

Key words: ischemic optic neuropathy, glucocorticoids, visual field