眼科 ›› 2021, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (2): 118-123.doi: 10.13281/j.cnki.issn.1004-4469.2021.02.008

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

使用矢高仿真软件与标准试戴片验配角膜塑形镜结果的一致性分析

甄毅1,2  申婧1,2  王文华1,3  高杰1,3  李倩1,3  王宁利1,2   

  1. 1首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院  北京同仁眼科中心  北京市眼科研究所  眼科学与视觉科学北京市重点实验室  国家眼科诊断与治疗工程技术研究中心 100005;2北京航空航天大学-首都医科大学  北京大数据精准医疗高精尖创新中心 100005;3北京天明眼科新技术开发公司 100005

  • 收稿日期:2020-07-08 出版日期:2021-03-25 发布日期:2021-03-26
  • 通讯作者: 王宁利,Email: wningli@vip.163.com
  • 基金资助:
    北京大数据精准医疗高精尖创新项目

Consistency analysis of the results of fitting orthokeratology lens based on sagittal height simulation software and standard trial lens

Zhen Yi1,2, Shen Jing1,2, Wang Wenhua1,3, Gao Jie1,3, Li Qian1,3, Wang Ningli1,2   

  1. 1National Engineering Research Center for Ophthalmology, Beijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100005, China; 2Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Big Data-Based Precision Medicine, Beihang University & Capital Medical University, Beijing 100005, China; 3Beijing Tianming Ophthalmology New Technology Development Company, Beijing 100005, China

  • Received:2020-07-08 Online:2021-03-25 Published:2021-03-26
  • Contact: Wang Ningli, Email: wningli@vip.163.com
  • Supported by:
    Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Big Data-Based Precision Medicine Project

摘要: 目的 比较使用矢高仿真软件与标准试戴片验配角膜塑形镜结果的一致性。设计 诊断试验。研究对象 北京同仁医院验配角膜塑形镜、平均年龄(9.9±2.2)岁的青少年近视患者60例(117眼)。方法  所有患者均使用标准试戴片进行角膜塑形镜验配,由视光师根据患者的角膜地形图数据及经验选择第一片试戴片的定位弧(AC)曲率值,然后根据试戴后的裂隙灯荧光染色和角膜地形图结果调整,确定需要生产镜片的AC曲率值。采用北京市眼科研究所研发的矢高仿真软件(TR-SAG),根据输入的患者角膜平坦K值、e值、角膜直径自动计算出角膜的矢高,进一步在镜片数据库中寻找与角膜矢高最相近的镜片,以镜片的AC曲率值作为矢高仿真软件的输出结果。使用单因素方差分析、Bland-Altman 散点图评价两种方法的差异性,使用组内相关系数评价两种方法结果的一致性。主要指标 镜片的AC曲率值。结果 视光师确定的第一片试戴片AC曲率值为(42.15±1.30)D,试戴、调整后确定的需生产镜片的AC曲率值为(42.10±1.28)D;TR-SAG计算的镜片AC曲率值为(42.12±1.28)D,三者比较差异无统计学意义(F=0.050,P=0.951)。TR-SAG计算的镜片AC曲率值与视光师根据经验确定的第一片试戴片AC曲率值的相关系数为0.970(P=0.000),与通过试戴、调整后确定的需生产镜片AC曲率值的相关系数为0.968(P=0.000),均具有很好的一致性。结论 TR-SAG软件计算出的角膜塑形镜生产参数与视光师依经验使用标准试戴片获得的生产参数具有很好的一致性。(眼科,2021,30: 118-123)


关键词: 角膜塑形镜, 矢高, 仿真, 一致性检验

Abstract:  Objective To compare the consistency of the results of fitting orthokeratology lens based on sagittal height simulation software and standard trial lens. Design Diagnostic tests. Participants 60 subjects (117 eyes, age 9.9±2.2 years) with myopic who needed orthokeratology fitting in Beijing Tongren Hospital. Methods Standard trial lenses were used for orthokeratology fitting in all subjects. The optometrist first experientially selected the first trial lens based on the patient's topographic map data, and then determined the parameters of lens to be produced according to the slit lamp fluorescent staining and the change of the topographic map after the try-on. The AC values of the first trial lens and the lens to be produced were recorded separately. The TR-SAG Sagittal height simulation software was developed by Beijing Institute of Ophthalmology. The software automatically calculates the corneal sagittal height based on the input patient corneal flat K value, e value, and corneal diameter, and further searches for the lens closest to the corneal sagittal height in the lens database. The AC value of the lens was taken as the output of the simulation software. One-way analysis of variance and Bland-Altman scatter plot was used to evaluate the difference between the two methods, and the intra-group correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the consistency of the results of the two methods. Main Outcome Measures AC value of the lens. Results The AC value of the first trial lens determined by the optometrist was 42.15±1.30 D. The AC value of the lens to be produced determined after the try-on was 42.10±1.28 D. And the AC value of the lens calculated by simulation software was 42.12±1.28 D. There was no significant difference among the three groups (F=0.050, P=0.951). The correlation coefficient between the AC value of the lens calculated by simulation software and the AC value of the first trial lens was 0.970 (P=0.000), and the correlation coefficient with the AC value of the lens needs to be produced was 0.968 (P=0.000), which were in good consistency. Conclusions The parameters of the orthokeratology lens calculated by the TR-SAG software are in good agreement with the parameters obtained by the optometrist using the standard trial lens. (Ophthalmol CHN, 2021, 30: 118-123)


Key words:  orthokeratology lens, sagittal, simulation, consistency test