眼科 ›› 2012, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (4): 278-281.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

回弹式眼压计在先天性青光眼患者眼压测量中的临床评价

甄毅  王涛  王文欣  郑松   

  1. 100730首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院  北京同仁眼科中心 北京市眼科学与视觉科学重点实验室
  • 收稿日期:2012-04-06 出版日期:2012-07-25 发布日期:2012-07-27
  • 通讯作者: 王涛,Email:stevenwa@126.com

Clinical evaluation of the rebounder tonometer in patients with congenital glaucoma

ZHEN Yi, WANG Tao, WANG Wen-xin, ZHENG Song.   

  1. Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University; Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Laboratory, Beijing 100730, China
  • Received:2012-04-06 Online:2012-07-25 Published:2012-07-27
  • Contact: WANG Tao, Email: stevenwa@126.com

摘要: 【摘要】 目的 通过与手持压平式眼压计和Schi?觟tz眼压计进行比较评价回弹式眼压计在先天性青光眼患者眼压测量中的价值。设计 诊断技术评价。研究对象 北京同仁眼科中心连续接受眼压测量的平均年龄(12.0 ± 3.0)个月的先天性青光眼患者29例(29眼)。方法 应用回弹式眼压计、Perkins手持压平式眼压计、Schi?觟tz眼压计测量眼压,每种眼压计测量眼压重复三次。主要指标 眼压值,Pearson相关系数(r)。结果 回弹式眼压计、Schi?觟tz眼压计和压平式眼压计所测眼压平均值分别为(19.3±8.5)mm Hg、(21.1±10.8)mm Hg和(18.5±7.8)mm Hg(F=0.61,P=0.55)。回弹式眼压计与手持压平眼压计的平均差值为(0.8±2.4)mm Hg。Schi?觟tz眼压计与手持压平眼压计平均差值为(2.6±2.4)mm Hg,Schi?觟tz眼压计与回弹眼压计的平均差值为(1.8±2.4)mm Hg。回弹式眼压计与手持压平式眼压计(r=0.934,P=0.000)、Schi?觟tz眼压计(r=0.933,P=0.000)眼压值均显著相关。结论 回弹式眼压计的准确性可满足先天性青光眼患者眼压测量的需求。(眼科,2012,21:278-281)

关键词:  , 眼压, 先天性青光眼, 回弹式眼压计, 准确性

Abstract: 【Abstract】 Objective To evaluate the clinical value of the rebounder tonometer (RBT) in congenital glaucoma by comparing with Perkins applanation tonometer and Schiotz tomometer. Design Evaluation of diagnostic techniques. Participants 29 cases (29 eyes) of the congenital glaucoma patients aged 12.0 ± 3.0 months who were measured intraocular pressure (IOP) in Beijing Tongren Eye Center. Method IOP was measured with the rebound tonometer, Schiotz tonometer and Perkins applanation tonometer. Measurements  were repeated three times each tonometer. Main Outcome Measures IOP values and Pearson correlation coefficient. Results Mean IOP values obtained by RBT, Schiotz and Perkins tonometer were 19.3±8.5 mm Hg, 21.1±10.8 mm Hg, and 18.5±7.8 mm Hg, respectively(F=0.61, P=0.55). The difference of IOP values among three tonometers was not significant. The average difference between RBT and Perkins tonometer was 0.8±2.4 mm Hg. The average difference between Schiotz and Perkins tonometer was 2.6±2.4 mm Hg. The average difference between Schiotz and RBT was (1.8±2.4)mm Hg. The values of Perkins applanation tonometer were significant correlated with RBT (r=0.934,P=0.000) and Schiotz(r=0.933,P=0.000). Conclusion The accuracy of rebounder tonometer can meet the IOP measurement needs in congenital glaucoma patients. (Ophthalmol CHN, 2012, 21: 278-281)

Key words:  intraocular pressure, congenital glaucoma, rebounder tonometer, accuracy