眼科 ›› 2013, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (1): 62-66.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

首选玻璃体腔注射贝伐单抗与曲安奈德对比治疗视网膜分支静脉阻塞继发黄斑水肿疗效及安全性差异的荟萃分析

麻南  李丹  高付林  赵宏伟  白凤华  胡莲娜   

  1. 100101北京,解放军306医院眼科(麻南、高付林、赵宏伟、白凤华、胡莲娜);检验科(李丹)
  • 收稿日期:2012-09-12 出版日期:2013-01-25 发布日期:2013-01-30
  • 通讯作者: 胡莲娜,Email:hulianna57@yahoo.com.cn

Comparison of efficacy and complications in treatment of macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion by intravitreal bevacizumab with intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide for first priority: a meta-analysis

MA Nan1, LI Dan2, GAO Fu-lin1, ZHAO Hong-wei1, BAI Feng-hua1, HU Lian-na1   

  1. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, 306th Hospital of PLA, Beijing 100101, China; 2. Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, 306th Hospital of PLA, Beijing 100101, China
  • Received:2012-09-12 Online:2013-01-25 Published:2013-01-30
  • Contact: HU Lian-na, Email: hulianna57@yahoo.com.cn

摘要: 目的 综合评价玻璃体腔注射贝伐单抗(IVB)与玻璃体腔注射曲安奈德(IVT)对比治疗视网膜分支静脉阻塞(BRVO)继发黄斑水肿时的疗效与安全性的差异。 设计 荟萃分析(Meta分析)。研究对象 Medline(1966-2012年)、EMbase(1966-2011年)、Cochrane图书馆(2011年)及中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)(1979-2011年)有关贝伐单抗与曲安奈德对比治疗BRVO继发黄斑水肿的临床对照研究文献资料。 方法 采用Cochrane系统评价的方法,检索上述文献,按照纳入和排除标准限定研究对象,通过Jadad评分量表进行文献质量评估后,使用Cochrane协作网提供的RevMan 5.1统计软件进行Meta分析,以获得两种治疗BRVO继发黄斑水肿的疗效及安全性是否有差异的相关证据。 主要指标 中央黄斑厚度(CMT),最佳矫正视力(BCVA),不良反应。 结果 共纳入IVB与IVT对比治疗BRVO继发黄斑水肿的临床对照研究8项(共376眼)。Meta分析结果显示,首选IVB组与首选IVT组的患者CMT降低幅度的差异为12.76 μm(95%CI,-7.74 ~ 33.26 μm,P=0.22);提高BCVA幅度的差异为0.11 (95%CI,-0.00~0.23,P=0.06)。首选IVT组发生不良反应的比例是首选IVB组的20倍(95%CI,8.3~50倍,P=0.000)。 结论 采用首选IVB与IVT对比治疗BRVO继发黄斑水肿时,在降低CMT及提高BCVA方面两者疗效相仿,但安全性方面IVT明显较IVB差。二者间谁更适合作为BRVO继发黄斑水肿的首选治疗,尚需更多前瞻性大样本的临床随机对照试验数据支持。(眼科,2013,22:62-66)

关键词:  , 贝伐单抗, 曲安奈德, 视网膜分支静脉阻塞, 黄斑水肿, 荟萃分析

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety in treatment of macular edema (ME) secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) by intravitreal bevacizumab(IVB) with intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide(IVT) for first priority. Design Meta-analysis. Participants Published literature in Medline (1966-2012), EMbase (1966-2011), Cochrane library (2011) and CBM (1979-2011) which comparing IVB with IVT in treatment of ME secondary to BRVO for first priority. Methods According to evaluation guidelines of Cochrane collaboration, clinical controlled trials (CCTs) were searched using Medline, EMbase, the Cochrane Library and CBM. Methodology evaluation of publications was performed by experienced researchers according to the Jadad Score. RevMan 5.1 offered by Cochrane was used to do the meta-analysis. Main Outcome Measures Central macular thickness (CMT), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and adverse events. Results Only 8 publications (376 eyes) were included into this meta-analysis. No significant difference in either CMT (P=0.22) or BCVA (P=0.06) was observed between IVB and IVT group. Adverse event rates (mainly elevation of intraocular pressure and progression of cataracts) in IVT group was 20 times (95%CI, 8.3-50 times) more than IVB group (P=0.000).  Conclusion This meta-analysis shows that IVT group had an equal reduced CMT and BCVA compared with IVB group in treatment of ME secondary to BRVO, while the adverse event rates were much frequent than in the IVB group. More high quality prospective studies are still required for further analysis. (Ophthalmol CHN, 2013, 22: 62-66)

Key words: bevacizumab, triamcinolone, branch retinal vein occlusion, macular edema, meta-analysis