灯箱视力表与Freiburg电子视力表应用对比研究

眼科 ›› 2013, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (2): 117-120.

灯箱视力表与Freiburg电子视力表应用对比研究

杨瑶华, 甄毅, 吴海涛, 李鹏　

300007空军杭州航空医学鉴定训练中心（杨瑶华、吴海涛）；100730 首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院北京同仁眼科中心北京市眼科学与视觉科学重点实验室国家眼病诊断与治疗设备工程技术研究中心（甄毅）；深圳市莫廷影像技术有限公司（李鹏）

收稿日期:2012-11-23 出版日期:2013-03-25 发布日期:2013-03-26
通讯作者: 甄毅，Email：dr_zhenyi@yahoo.com.cn

Comparison between light house visual acuity chart and Freiburg electronic visual acuity chart

YANG Yao-Hua¹, Zhen-Yi², WU Hai-Tao¹, Li-Peng³-　

1. The Aviation Medical Assessment and Training Center in Hangzhou, Hangzhou 300007, China; 2. National Engineering Research Center for Ophthalmic Equipments, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100730, China; 3. Shenzhen MOPTIM Imaging Technique Co., Ltd

Received:2012-11-23 Online:2013-03-25 Published:2013-03-26
Contact: ZHEN Yi, Email：dr_zhenyi@yahoo.com.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的比较灯箱视力表与Freiburg电子视力表结果的一致性与可重复性，评价Freiburg电子视力表的临床应用价值。设计诊断性技术评价。研究对象 空军杭州航空医学鉴定训练中心的工作人员86例，平均年龄（26.3±2.1）岁。方法所有入选者均随机由2位固定检查者分别使用灯箱视力表和Freiburg电子视力表进行检查，两种视力表检查的顺序随机决定。所有检查均在同一房间内完成，房间内亮度小于3 lux。检查距离均为3 m。对不同视力表间与检查者间测量重复性采用配对t检验比较结果的差别并计算相关系数r值。主要指标 使用两种视力表获得的logMAR视力。结果在检查者一，用灯箱视力表查，被检者logMAR视力为0.19±0.23，Freiburg电子视力表0.20±0.15，两者差值为-0.011±0.141，差异无统计学意义（t=-0.741, P=0.461），但有显著相关性（r=0.808，P=0.000）。在检查者二，用灯箱视力表查，被检者logMAR视力为0.32±0.25，Freiburg电子视力表为0.20±0.15，两者差值为-0.118±0.151，差异有统计学意义（t=7.191, P=0.000）及显著相关性（r=0.810，P=0.000）。均用灯箱视力表，检查者一、二的差异有统计学意义（F=11.872，P=0.001），两者显著相关（r=0.938，P=0.000）。而均用Freiburg电子视力表，检查者一、二的差异无统计学意义（F=0.019，P=0.890），两者显著相关（r=0.986，P=0.000）。结论 Freiburg电子视力表受检查者因素的影响小于灯箱视力表，其在不同测量者间的可重复性优于灯箱视力表。（眼科, 2013, 22: 117-120）

关键词: , 视力表, 灯箱式视力表, 电子视力表

Abstract: Objective To investigate the clinical application value of Freiburg electronic visual acuity chart by comparing the consistency and repeatability between light house visual acuity chart (LHVAC) and Freiburg electronic visual acuity chart(Freiburg). Design Evaluation of diagnostic technology. Participants Eighty-six staff members（45 men and 41 women）from the Air Force of Hangzhou Aviation Medicine Training Center were involved, with an average age of 26.3±2.1 years. Method All subjects were examined randomly and successively using LHVAC and Freiburg. All examinations were done in the same room. The brightness of the room was less than 3 lux and the work distance was 3 m. For each subject, the difference in visual acuity measurements obtained with the two visual acuity charts were evaluated by paired t-test and R value of the correlation coefficient were calculated. Main Outcome Measures LogMAR visual acuity obtained using the two charts. Results When used first, the logMAR visual acuity of LHVAC was 0.19±0.23. Accordingly, the result of Freiburg was 0.20±0.15. The difference between the two results was -0.011±0.141, the results showed that these two charts had no statistically significant difference between them（t=-0.741, P=0.461）and had significant correlation (r=0.808, P=0.000). When used in second, the logMAR visual acuity of LHVAC chart was 0.32±0.25. Accordingly, the result of Freiburg was 0.20±0.15. The difference between the two results was -0.118±0.151, the results showed that these two charts had a statistically significant difference between them（t=7.191, P=0.000, however the results were significantly correlated (r=0.810, P=0.000). Using LHVAC, the difference between the two examinations was significant (F=11.872，P=0.001) and the correlation coefficient was 0.938 (P=0.000). Using Freiburg examination, the difference between the two examinations was not significant (F=0.019，P=0.890) and the correlation coefficient was 0.986 (P=0.000). Conclusion The influence of examination order on Freiburg was less than with LHVAC and the repeatability of Freiburg was better than LHVAC. (Ophthalmol CHN, 2013, 22: 117-120)

Key words: visual acuity chart, light house visual acuity chart, electronic visual acuity chart

杨瑶华, 甄毅, 吴海涛, 李鹏　. 灯箱视力表与Freiburg电子视力表应用对比研究[J]. 眼科, 2013, 22(2): 117-120.

YANG Yao-Hua, Zhen-Yi, WU Hai-Tao, Li-Peng-　. Comparison between light house visual acuity chart and Freiburg electronic visual acuity chart[J]. Ophthalmology in China, 2013, 22(2): 117-120.

[1]	李建军张莉彭晓燕. 远程眼科眼底像阅片诊断应注意的问题[J]. 眼科, 2104, 23(4): 217-220.
[2]	董贺徐少凯张繁友. Nd∶YAG激光击射瞳孔膜治疗瞳孔膜闭继发青光眼的临床观察[J]. 眼科, 2104, 23(4): 260-263.
[3]	张潇王忠海李莹姜洋罗岩陈秉钧丁欣. 玻璃酸钠及碱性成纤维细胞生长因子滴眼液用于单纯干眼和LASIK术后患者的临床疗效[J]. 眼科, 2104, 23(4): 274-279.
[4]	王怀洲1 胡曼2 辛晨1 石砚1 李猛1 王宁利1. 微导管辅助的小梁切开术治疗原发性先天性青光眼的远期疗效观察[J]. 眼科, 2020, 29(1): 15-19.
[5]	王婧张楠余烁刘新丽卢弘. 内毒素耐受对内毒素诱导的葡萄膜炎炎症程度及虹膜睫状体中PI3K/AKT 信号通路的影响[J]. 眼科, 2020, 29(1): 50-54.
[6]	周瑞陈娟林思勇. 视网膜分支静脉阻塞继发黄斑水肿玻璃体注射雷珠单抗不同治疗方案的疗效对比[J]. 眼科, 2020, 29(1): 63-67.
[7]	朱谷雨张景尚万修华. 炎性因子在乙肝病毒携带的白内障患者房水中的表达及意义[J]. 眼科, 2020, 29(1): 69-72.
[8]	陈宁1 梁娜2 黄帅2 郭立坤2 马海鹏2 李钰泓2. 逆行置入新型RS硅胶管在下泪小管断裂吻合术中的应用[J]. 眼科, 2020, 29(1): 73-74.
[9]	冯丙岂刘旭阳何芬李丹丽张达人赵林樊宁. 两个成骨不全家系的COL1A1基因突变筛查及临床特征分析[J]. 眼科, 2019, 28(4): 273-279.
[10]	赵琦杨文利李栋军王子杨陈伟李逸丰崔蕊沈琳鲜军舫. IOLMaster700与IOLMaster500眼轴测量的一致性评价[J]. 眼科, 2019, 28(3): 235-238.
[11]	辛晨石砚王怀洲王宁利. 以光纤微导管为工具的青光眼微创手术[J]. 眼科, 2019, 28(2): 85-87.
[12]	于周兴李绍伟霍冬梅徐漫石帅刘畅赵瑞华 . 光线追踪法测算角膜屈光术后人工晶状体度数准确性评估[J]. 眼科, 2019, 28(2): 98-103.
[13]	刘月明延艳妮李洋魏文斌. 国产敷贴器治疗合并严重渗出性视网膜脱离的Sturge-Weber综合征的临床观察[J]. 眼科, 2019, 28(2): 125-128.
[14]	肖明马代金. 联合应用Corvis ST和Pentacam角膜地形图诊断圆锥角膜[J]. 眼科, 2019, 28(2): 150-154.
[15]	秦健翔解彦茜胡城王小洁梁远波. 针刺分离联合巩膜通道重建术治疗青光眼术后远期失败滤过泡[J]. 眼科, 2019, 28(1): 39-42.